According to in-store data from Grips Intelligence, StealthMounts generated the majority of its revenue through Lowes.com, which accounted for 69.6% of total revenue share between January and May 2026, followed by Ace Hardware at 19.0% and Amazon at 11.4%. The brand's average product price stood at $23.90 across all tracked retailers during this period. Notably, StealthMounts experienced a significant revenue decline of 40.3% over the March to May 2026 period, even as its average price increased by 8.3% during the same timeframe. This inverse relationship between rising prices and falling revenue suggests potential price sensitivity among consumers in the tool accessories segment. The data, covering Lowes.com, Ace Hardware, and Amazon, highlights how StealthMounts' heavy reliance on a single retail channel may present both a concentration risk and an opportunity for diversified growth.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 38% from Mar to May.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has increased by 8% from Mar to May.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for StealthMounts on Ace Hardware.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for StealthMounts.
BY REVENUE
StealthMounts sells 27% online and 73% offline. Online runs through 2 channels; offline through 2.
Online
27%
73%
Offline
Online channels
27%
Offline channels
73%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 8.3K ratings on 3 channels, StealthMounts averages 4.7★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.8–5.0 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.7
/ 5
From 8.3K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$26.99
Price
$6K
Revenue
$26.99
Price
$5.7K
Revenue
$26.99
Price
$3.13K
Revenue
$26.99
Price
$2.35K
Revenue
$24.99
Price
$1.77K
Revenue
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis