According to in-store data from Grips Intelligence, Pine Mountain generated the majority of its revenue through acehardware.com, which accounted for 71.4% of total revenue share from January to May 2026, followed by Amazon at 20.2%, with lowes.com and menards.com trailing at 5.1% and 3.4% respectively. The brand's average product price during this period stood at $17.31, reflecting a 9.7% overall decrease in average pricing over the tracked timeframe. Pine Mountain experienced a significant revenue decline of 68.0% over the March to May 2026 period, signaling a notable downward trend in consumer demand. The heavy concentration of revenue at Ace Hardware suggests Pine Mountain maintains a strong niche retail partnership, while its presence across four major retailers demonstrates moderate market distribution. These insights, powered by Grips Intelligence, highlight both the brand's retail positioning and the pricing and revenue challenges it faces heading into mid-2026.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, revenue on tracked channels has declined by 65% from Mar to May.
OVER TIME
Over the last three months, average selling price on tracked channels has decreased by 9% from Mar to May.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across product categories for Pine Mountain on Ace Hardware.
REVENUE SHARE
Revenue distribution across tracked channels for Pine Mountain.
BY REVENUE
Pine Mountain sells 20% online and 80% offline. Online runs through 2 channels; offline through 2. Online share has moved from 2% in Jan to 31% in May.
Online
20%
80%
Offline
Online channels
20%
Offline channels
80%
BY REVIEW COUNT
Across 70K ratings on 4 channels, Pine Mountain averages 4.5★. Most reviews for the products are in the 4.4–4.6 range.
BRAND AVERAGE
4.5
/ 5
From 70K ratings
Products are bracketed by their average rating, so all of an individual product's reviews fall into one bracket. This isn't a per-star breakdown of individual reviews.
BY REVENUE
$149.99
Price
Revenue
$329.99
Price
Revenue
$89.99
Price
Revenue
Get access to full product performance analysis